Item type:Thesis, Open Access

Vergleich verschiedener Membranen zur GTR-Behandlung - klinische 3-Jahresstudie

Thumbnail Image

Files

dat.pdf (1.84 MB)

Date

2004-12-15

Authors

Publisher

Philipps-Universität Marburg
DOI

Supervisors

Abstract

The objective of the present clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of 4 membrans used for GTR treatment (Resolut Regenerative Material, Gore Tex Periodontal Material, Guidor, Vicryl). We defined "efficacy" by a reduction of the furcation defects, reduction of probing depth and attachment level. As the results were very similar, we cannot recommend any particular of the 4 membrans used.

Review

Metadata

Contributors
Supervisor:
Dates
Created: 2004Issued: 2004-12-15Updated: 2011-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17192/z2004.0694
Faculty
Medizin
Publisher
Philipps-Universität Marburg
Language
ger
Data types
DoctoralThesis
Keywords
GTRMembranFurcation defect
DFG-subjects
GoreGuidorGTRMembranResolutFurkationsbefallVicrylWachstumsfaktorenParodontale Wundheilung
DDC-Numbers
610
License
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/
URI
https://open.uni-marburg.de/handle/10.17192/z2004.0694
show more
Tjaden, Antje: Vergleich verschiedener Membranen zur GTR-Behandlung - klinische 3-Jahresstudie. : Philipps-Universität Marburg 2004-12-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17192/z2004.0694.

License

item.page.license.under-copyright
This item has been published with the following license: In Copyright