Item type:Thesis, Open Access

Die ethische Beurteilung der Präimplantationsdiagnostik aus der Perspektive der Prinzipienethik (Tom L. Beauchamp/James F. Childress) und der feministischen Ethik (Susan Sherwin)

Thumbnail Image

Files

ddr.pdf (2.71 MB)

Date

2007-10-29

Authors

Publisher

Philipps-Universität Marburg
DOI

Supervisors

Abstract

This work compares two types of biomedical ethics: the ethical theory of Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress (principlism) and the ethical theory of Susan Sherwin (feminist ethics). Both theories are evaluated in terms of their practical orientation and context sensitivity regarding the ethical conflict of the legalisation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in Germany.

Review

Metadata

Contributors
Supervisor:
Dates
Created: 2007Issued: 2007-10-29Updated: 2011-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17192/z2007.0644
Faculty
Medizin
Publisher
Philipps-Universität Marburg
Language
ger
Data types
DoctoralThesis
Keywords
PräimplantationsdiagnostikPrinzipienethikPreimplantation genetic diagnosisFeminist ethicsBiomedical ethicsPrinciplism
DFG-subjects
Medizinische EthikFeministische EthikPraktische Ethik
DDC-Numbers
610
License
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/
URI
https://open.uni-marburg.de/handle/10.17192/z2007.0644
show more
Reitz, Daniela: Die ethische Beurteilung der Präimplantationsdiagnostik aus der Perspektive der Prinzipienethik (Tom L. Beauchamp/James F. Childress) und der feministischen Ethik (Susan Sherwin). : Philipps-Universität Marburg 2007-10-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17192/z2007.0644.

License

item.page.license.under-copyright
This item has been published with the following license: In Copyright