Item type:Thesis, Open Access

Vergleich Gastrinrezeptorszintigraphie mit 111-In-DTPA-D-Glu1-Minigastrin versus Somatostatinrezeptorszintigraphie mit 111-In-DTPA-D-Phe1-Octreotid bei Patienten mit neuroendokrinen Tumoren.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Publisher

Philipps-Universität Marburg

Supervisors

Abstract

60 patients with neuroendocrine tumors received a somatostatin receptor szintigraphy (SRS) and a gastrin receptor scintigraphy (GRS) (51 carcinoids, 3 gastrinomas, 2 glucagonomas, 1 insulinoma, 3 paragangliomas). In 81.7% of the patients, SRS detected tumor lesions. In GRS, 78.3% were positive. In 68.3%, both techniques showed positive results. GRS was positive in 54.5% of SRS negative patients. Overall, GRS showed a better performance than SRS in 21.7% while SRS was better in 40.0%. Conclusion: Though overall performance of SRS may be better, GRS should be performed in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors after SRS, when SRS is negative.

Review

Metadata

show more
Graß, Julia: Vergleich Gastrinrezeptorszintigraphie mit 111-In-DTPA-D-Glu1-Minigastrin versus Somatostatinrezeptorszintigraphie mit 111-In-DTPA-D-Phe1-Octreotid bei Patienten mit neuroendokrinen Tumoren.. : Philipps-Universität Marburg 2006-07-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17192/z2006.0495.

License

This item has been published with the following license: In Copyright